Nov 3, 2024
Current Year Results
Results Search
Biggest/Best Boston Qualifier
2024 Results
2023 Results
2022 Results
2021 Results
2020 Results
2019 Results
2018 Results
2017 Results
2016 Results
2015 Results
2014 Results
2013 Results
2012 Results
2011 Results
2010 Results
2009 Results
2008 Results
2007 Results
2006 Results
2005 Results
2004 Results
2003 Results
2002 Results
2001 Results
2000 Results
☰
Callaway Gardens Marathon Runner Comments
Back to Callaway Gardens Marathon Information & Reviews
Course 4.2 
Organization 3.7 
Spectators 2.3
Number of comments: 77 [displaying comments 61 to 71]
|
S. W. from Atlanta
(1/31/2005)
"Organizers should invest in a GPS" (about: 2005)
6-10 previous marathons
| 3 Callaway Gardens Marathons
COURSE: 3 ORGANIZATION: 2 FANS: 1 After an awful drive to get to this through the snow and ice to arrive the day before (because of the 8.00am start), we found out 30 minutes prior to the start that it had been postponed for 2 hours. And that was just the tip of the iceberg. The delay was for clearing of trees from the course which were plainly obvious from the previous day's weather (also due to this the course was altered 'SLIGHTLY' to avoid the carnage). What the organizers did not know is that 2.5 miles was added to the distance!!! I found out because of my GPS around the first loop showed 14.2. I felt for the people doing the half who found their times had +8:00 minutes! If the organizers delayed the start, they had time to re-check the distance. All that was needed was to move the turn-around point in about 3/4 mile; easy, this was a closed course! This was my friend's first marathon... to do all that training and to feel 'cheated' at the end. What a waste. As for me, I found out I could sustain my pace for a longer distance! A bit of thought the day before could have avoided all the bitterness. | |
|
H. L. from Alabama
(1/30/2005)
"not the best race" (about: 2005)
6-10 previous marathons
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 1 FANS: 1 This race started off bad. There was an ice storm two nights before, but the morning of the marathon no one had even begun to clean up tree limbs off the course. The race started 2 hours late, and when it was supposed to start, the people setting up the clock, etc., had been sitting around and weren't even ready to go. They had to re-route the course, and instead of 26.2 miles, I ended up running close to 30! There was no Gatorade or any kind of food or gel. ONLY WATER, and for this course, that is ridiculous. Some volunteers were not very nice. They sat in a chair and did not hand out water. They did not know what mile it was and there were NO mile markers past #4. I did not have a very good experience. This marathon could be a lot better if it was run correctly because the course is beautiful. | |
|
C. S. from Georgia
(2/8/2004)
"Sub-Quality Race Flyer" (about: 2004)
COURSE: 3 ORGANIZATION: 2 FANS: 1 Race flyer doesn't say that there is a 5 1/2 hour cutoff, which is ridiculous for this course. Race flyer doesn't say runners can start early if they cannot make the cutoff. Race flyer had no information about the awards ceremony for the marathon, nor any information about what type of awards or how many places would be presented for the 5K, 1/2 marathon or marathon. Medal sucks - same medal for the marathon and half marathon is just plain cheap and unprofessional. No bananas or oranges on the course. Volunteers on the course were GREAT! Race flyer contains a flat out lie ? says the course is fast and scenic qualifier for Boston. With the hills on this course, there is no way it should be called ?fast? and should not be on anyone?s list as a qualifier for Boston. There need to be several improvements before I would recommend this race to anyone. | |
|
K. G. from Douglasville, Georgia
(2/4/2004)
"It was a very scenic course, but very challenging" (about: 2004)
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 3 FANS: 2 I enjoyed the first half of the marathon course immensely, but the hills seemed longer and steeper the second time around. It would have been nice to have bananas or oranges on the course along with the Gatorade and water. The cut-off time should be annotated on the flyer if the course is to be shut down after 5 1/2 or 6 hours. Additionally, the time for the marathon awards ceremony should be annotated as well. Overall, it was a challenging but very good course. | |
|
Runner from Alpharetta from Georgia
(2/2/2004)
"Fair But Challenging Half" (about: 2004)
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 1 Ran the half. Course was really nice, scenic, quiet run through the woods, 99% on pavement (nice), tough wind around the lakes. No spectators, but that was to be expected. Mile markers every mile. Aid stations every few miles, but the need to add to their offerings - no Gatorade, gels are nice, maybe packets of petroleum jelly. | |
|
Jeff Raymond from Atlanta, Ga.
(2/2/2004)
"Good run at Callaway" (about: 2004)
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 3 FANS: 2 Nice, intimate course. It was a bit cool in the morning but I thought the course was laid out nice. It was rolling hills and a 'double-loop' for us marathoners. The second time around sure felt like the hills were larger. I had a PR on the course though. It is a VERY good spectator course (wife went to breakfast & hotel room in between start, half and ending). There was the correct number of water stations but I thought they could have had a couple of stations with some fruit. I was fortunate enough to have my wife hand me a banana after the first loop. I liked the course enough to say it is definitely a 'do-over.' | |
|
R. H. from Auburn, AL
(2/2/2004)
"Let Down " (about: 2004)
COURSE: 3 ORGANIZATION: 2 FANS: 1 The ONLY reason I gave organization 2 stars was for the pick up area and the start/finish area. Some water stops ran out of cups, so cups on the ground were 'recycled', no Gatorade at most sites (maybe 2 in 26 miles) CHEAP medals, cars on the course, no gels, no medical stations (to be seen), not much food at the finish line, and no spectators. They had bagels, bananas, and some lemon cookies at the finish line, but I am use to having a much better spread at the local races. Oh yeah, they did have a table with some delicous looking sweets, coffee, and sandwiches, but they were SELLING them. I got a better medal at the AUBURN 1/2 Marathon last month, paid less than $20 and had an AWESOME after-race meal... plus the money raised went to charity! | |
|
J. B. from Alabama
(2/2/2004)
"Beautiful course, poor support" (about: 2004)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 2 FANS: 1 The course was beautiful, but otherwise I found this race disappointing. My biggest complaint is that the water stops (self serve) were mostly unmanned during the second loop, and some had run out of water or only had dirty water (tree junk had fallen into the cups while they sat there). Gatorade was not provided at every other water station as advertised - it was available only at the 8 mile and 11 mile stations (21 & 24 the second loop). There was only one restroom convenient to the course (~miles 6 & 19). The medal was REALLY cheap looking. The awards were pretty cheap-looking too. If you are going to run this race, I recommend that you wear a fuel belt so you do not have to rely on their aid stations for fluids during the second loop. Train for rolling hills because there are lots of them! Better yet - run the half marathon here and run your marathon effort at one of the other two small marathons (Museum of Aviation and Cherry Blossom) held nearby. While the courses of those two races are not as scenic, the value and support is much better. | |
|
D. N. from Auburn, AL
(2/2/2004)
"Beautiful course, but not easy" (about: 2004)
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 2 FANS: 2 Beautiful course, but it was not clearly marked. Ended up off of the course for about 10 minutes before I found somone to direct me in the wrong direction. Very little Gatorade along the way. I have run the half here many times and I have been very happy, but not this time. Hard way to run your first full when you have to add on a few miles. Course is very nice to look at but rolling with a big hill area that you have to run twice. | |
|
k. S. from Athens Ga
(2/2/2004)
"Beautiful course... mediocre support" (about: 2004)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 3 FANS: 3 Pros: Great course, beautiful, almost like a trail run, friendly Hughston staff, intimate. Cons: Gatorade, once on entire course at the last stop, confusing directions (or none at all) at some intersections. I like small crowds so this was ideal. Rolling hills are challenging the second time around. |
Quick Links
Marathon Search
Upcoming US Marathons
Upcoming International Marathons
Search Marathon Results
Latest Running News
Recent Newsletters
Race Director Tools
© 2000-2024, All Rights Reserved by MarathonGuide.com LLC
