MarathonGuide.com Logo - Marathon Directory, Marathons, Marathon Results, News and More Click Here: Please visit our Sponsor facebook icon  twitter icon
Site Map
 
   Marathon Press Releases
Press Releases Home
Vienna City Marathon: Information & Reviews | News |
 

Press Release - Vienna City Marathon - 10/4/11

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

                       Only a Marathon is a Marathon

Is the "Marathon" in the sense of a running event 42,195 metres in length 
or merely 38 kilometres? The answer is: it depends on the sport you're 
doing. In running there is exact measurement of courses throughout the 
world. Triathlon, on the other hand, allows deviations from the rules of up 
to ten per cent. That represents a shortening of the marathon distance of 
up to 4.2 kilometres! "Triathlon courses cannot be counted as officially 
measured distances unless the same procedures are carried out as for road 
races," says Hugh Jones of AIMS, the Association of International Marathons 
and Distance Races. The Vienna City Marathon, an IAAF Gold Label Road Race, 
points out that running performances in triathlons must accordingly be 
viewed relatively and the name "Marathon" should be positioned in the sport 
of running as a brand name.

For years the same accurate and practical regulations for the course 
measurement of marathons and road races have been in place throughout the 
world. The Association of International Marathons and Distance Races (AIMS) 
has been a pioneer in this respect and created a binding apparatus for such 
work. It means that it can be guaranteed that a marathon really is 42,195 
metres in length. To be more exact: it is certain that a marathon is at 
least 42,195 metres long. This is because one thousandth of the distance is 
added to the measured course to ensure that there is no possibility that 
the prescribed distance falls short. In the case of a marathon, that is 
42.2 metres. 

A Marathon is a Marathon, wherever it may be

Everyone in running is aware of this and every serious event organiser 
keeps to this rule. That's how comparisons of performances and recognition 
of records are possible. This is a very good situation for the millions of 
runners, the organisers and the public. A marathon is a marathon, anywhere 
in the world. If an organiser departs from these rules, they are beyond the 
pale.

But couldn't it be just a little shorter?

"Marathons", "Half Marathons" and other running competitions are, however, 
part of triathlon events. These running distances are not measured 
according to AIMS criteria. The rules of the International Triathlon Union 
(ITU) permit considerable reductions: "Minor deviations in the individual 
disciplines for reasons of local conditions and/or the difficulty of the 
course are perfectly acceptable. However, at championships the deviations 
are only permitted to account for a maximum ± 10%, as the German Triathlon 
Union states on page 7 of their regulations (2011/13 edition). Reference: 
http://www.dtu-info.de/sportordnung.html?file=tl_files/dtu/PDFs/Ordnungen/S
portordnung%202011-3.pdf.

If the 10% rule is applied to a privately licensed IRONMAN competition, the 
"Marathon Distance" of 38 kilometres can be "short" and yet still be 
considered as conforming to the rules. Which organiser would not use the 
ruling to their advantage?

For example, in the competition arrangements for the Ironman Austria, the 
length of the running section is given as 42.195 kilometres. There then 
follows an addition which allows room for a great deal of interpretation: 
the distance should be understood having "slight variations depending on 
geographic course length" – Compare: 
http://www.triangle.cc/assets/imat_uploads/imat2012_athleten_reglement_en_.
doc).

In principle it matters very little what distance a triathlon includes. If 
an organiser wants to have the run around a particular curve of a lake and 
the running distance only comes to 40 kilometres, they're at liberty to do 
so. However, as soon as competition distances such as Marathons or Half 
Marathons as well as records are up for discussion, which are precisely 
regulated in running, the same criteria must be applied.

Recognition for Sporting Achievements!

In no way should the sporting achievements of triathlon and Ironman 
finishers be belittled and they deserve every respect. The triathletes 
themselves are among those who suffer in this situation, since their 
running times are not given in the lists for marathon best performances. A 
"Marathon" or "Half Marathon" in the context of a triathlon cannot be 
compared with a Marathon or Half Marathon conducted according to IAAF 
rules. There have been attempts in Britain to measure running distances at 
triathlons according to the same rules as in running. Unfortunately nothing 
has come of this, as the AIMS expert Hugh Jones reports.

...but under the same Criteria

To present a 38 km run as a course over the marathon distance is a gross 
deception to participants and public. Any spectator at a long distance 
triathlon who doesn't know better, thinks that the participants are running 
the same distance as at the London, New York or Berlin Marathon. But that 
is not the case.

To sportsmen and women who contest a marathon over 42,195 metres and are 
delighted if they achieve a hard earned personal best it must seem like a 
smack in the face to be compared with triathlon performances where the 
participants may only have covered 38 kilometres. Even the specialist media 
report enthusiastically about new Ironman World Records such as recently at 
the IRONMAN Austria in Klagenfurt or the long distance triathlon in Roth 
(Germany), although the criteria were lacking. The performances were also 
set on a par with times in marathon races achieved under IAAF rules. As 
long as different standards are applied in triathlon compared to athletics, 
this must be taken into account for running performances in triathlon.

IAAF Rules, but correct!

It is also incomprehensible that the International Triathlon Union ITU 
refers in its statutes in general to the guidelines of the world governing 
body of athletics, the IAAF (See: 
http://www.triathlon.org/images/uploads/eom4-appendix-eventsdepartment-2010
0331b.pdf - Run course measurement manual (Chapter 9, P. 113) - "This 
document is based on the content of the International Association of 
Athletics Federation (www.iaaf.org) and the Royal Spanish Federation of 
Athletics (www.rfea.es)..."), but when it comes to reality contravenes the 
regulations for course measurement to a startling degree.

There are several notable examples of the need for consistency and accuracy 
in course measurement in running:

-In 1981 the American Alberto Salazar achieved a time of 2:08:13 at the New 
York City Marathon – a world record at the time which was later annulled 
because the course was shown to be 148 metres short which is 
three-thousandths of the marathon distance.

-The Kenyan Paul Tergat ran 58:51 at the 1996 Stramilano Half Marathon in 
Milan which appeared to be the first time under 59 minutes. It later 
emerged that the course was 49 metres short, which meant that the world 
best was not officially recognised. 49 metres represents something over 
two-thousandths of a Half Marathon.

-In 2010 the Linz Marathon was correctly measured and then a 201 metre bend 
was removed. This led to none of the times subsequently achieved in that 
race being recorded in the list of best performances.

-The most recent example for the rightly high standard set for recognising 
records came in the 2011 Boston Marathon. Two runners went under the then 
valid world record of 2:03:59 which Haile Gebrselassie achieved in Berlin 
in 2008. Geoffrey Mutai (2:03:02) and Moses Mosop (2:03:06) were not able 
to celebrate a world record. Apart from the course being the correct 
length, which was, of course, the case in Boston, the criteria concerning 
the drop (max. one thousandth of the distance run, therefore 42 metres) and 
the distance between start and finish, which is permitted to be a maximum 
50 per cent of the distance run, which in the case of a marathon is 21.1 
kilometres, still had to be observed. The ruling on distance between start 
and finish is to prevent too much assistance from a tailwind. Both criteria 
– drop and distance between start and finish – are not met by the Boston 
Marathon. These criteria are set out in Paragraph 10, Note 28 of the 
International Competition Rules (IWR) of the World Federation of Athletics, 
the IAAF.

This would not have been a problem in triathlon. A Marathon can be 4.2 
kilometres short, a Half Marathon 2.1 kilometres. We therefore make this 
direct appeal: rules which have long been recognised in running, should 
also be valid in Triathlon and Duathlon.

Marathon, a Brand Name worth protecting!

It should be in the interest of the IAAF and AIMS that the name "Marathon" 
in the sport of running, ie a running competition over 42,195 metres, 
should have its own position as a brand name. In terms of marketing rights 
this is probably no longer possible, but certainly possible in the rules of 
the sports federations. Likewise, a swimming competition, a cycle race and 
a running competition which are held as a triathlon, are not automatically 
be allowed to call itself IRONMAN.

The first Marathon under Two Hours?

If athletes like Haile Gebrselassie, the new Marathon world record holder 
Patrick Makau or 30,000m track world record holder Moses Mosop were to be 
persuaded to run the "third leg" in an IRONMAN relay competition, the 
winning time would certainly be under two hours. Would the IAAF recognise 
that as a world record? No, because they would not have run a marathon.
 
                                  ###

 

Some Ads

Become an Advertiser

Click Here: Please visit our Sponsor

Click Here: Please visit our Sponsor

Click Here: Please visit our Sponsor

Click Here: Please visit our Sponsor

Become an Advertiser



All material Copyright ©2000-2024 MarathonGuide.com LLC (MarathonGuide.com). All rights Reserved.
Please Contact Us for more information.

MarathonGuide.com makes no representations as to the accuracy of information on this site or its suitability for any use. | privacy policy | refund policy